.@nearuaguild released a new Request for Proposals (RFP) open for discussion.
The proposal suggests excluding validators that already control ≥1.00% of total network stake from receiving performance-based delegation.
Stop Meta Pool performance delegation to validators ≥1% stake on NEAR
What: Exclude validators that already control ≥1.00% of total network stake from receiving performance-based delegation. (DAO-voted delegations remain unchanged.)
Why:
- Performance routing to already-large validators reinforces concentration.
- A neutral, fee-agnostic 1% cap keeps Meta Pool from pushing stake toward whales and helps preserve/improve the Nakamoto Coefficient (NC).
- Post-inflation-reduction environment = tighter rewards; this guardrail avoids starving smaller validators.
Current data:
- Meta Pool performance currently on ≥1% validators: ~680,963 NEAR (policy-relevant pool to stop/redirect).
Call to action:
Draft is posted on the NEAR governance forum — jump in, critique, improve. If there’s rough consensus, we’ll start voting at the end of the week.
Thoughts, numbers, counter-examples? Drop them below. 🗳️📉
1,132
17
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。